No doubt I could go on an on reporting both minor and major revelations I gathered from Douglas Reed’s book The Controversy of Zion but I’ll just point my spotlight on two of them today. His first report is from 1935 when Reed went to Moscow to witness part of the reality behind the lies more commonly promoted in media:
I was at once struck by something I had never met in any other country. My first report said
that Mr. Eden drove from the station through streets lined with “drab and silent crowds” and a Jewish censor demanded excision of these words. At first I thought this merely fatuous (I asked if he wished me to say that the throng was composed of top-hatted bourgeois) but in following days I saw more and in my book of 1938 wrote:
“The censorship department, and that means the whole machine for controlling the game and muzzling the foreign press, was entirely staffed by Jews, and this was a thing that puzzled me more than anything else in Moscow. There seemed not to be a single non-Jewish official in the whole outfit. . . I was told that the proportion of Jews in the government was small, but in this one department that I got to know intimately they seemed to have a monopoly, and I asked myself, where were the Russians? The answer seemed to be that they were in the drab, silent crowds which I had seen but which must not be heard of”.
I soon learned from older hands that “the proportion of Jews in the government” was in effect not small but that they retained a large measure of control, if they were not predominantly in control. I was unable to meet any Russians in Moscow, this was the other side of the same unique experience. I had never before beheld a ruling caste so completely segregated from the slave-mass.
Indeed, the Jews retained no small measure of control as they ran the whole show in the Soviet Union though later they apparently did it even more surreptiously than in the ’30s according to my current knowledge. And it’s hardly a big wonder that most of the older Russians have been rather confused about the true state of the matters when they have been living under such a regime (though honestly I’m not sure if the younger ones are generally that much more in the know these days.. often no it seems as they appear just as braindead if not more so than most others).
Another quite interesting revelation I found in Reed’s book about how some others than Westerners have seen a few things more clearly than us probably because they back then weren’t as completely under the barrage of misleading media fire doesn’t come from his personal experience but I think it’s illuminating enough for sharing even today:
The captivity of the London and Washington governments, and the identity of the captors, even today (1956) is not realized by the American and British masses… In the rest of the world it has long been understood. As long ago as the 1920’s for instance, the Maharajah of Kashmir asked Sir Arthur Lothian (as that British diplomat relates), “why the British government was establishing a ‘Yehudi ka Raj’ (Rule of the Jews) in India. I demurred to this description, but he insisted that it was true, saying the Viceroy, Lord Reading, was a Jew, the Secretary of State, Mr. Edwin Montague, was a Jew, the High Commissioner, Sir William Meyer, was a Jew, and what more evidence did I want?” Thus a remote Indian Maharajah, thirty years ago, clearly saw the true shape of coming events in the Western world.
No surprise that the Indian masses back then faced a future of the type of diminution that the Protocols had prescribed. Their Jewish overlords knew what the plan was in preparation for global enslavement.